Follow us on Google News
Get the latest updates directly in your Google News feed
It was the year 1979 when Mel Gibson starred in an iconic film that would go on to make history. Starring inMad Maxand portraying the role of a lonesome ranger on a desolate land, the film received rave reviews and developed into an iconic franchise that we know and love today.

It is often said that great things have humble beginnings and Mel Gibson was just a budding actor at that time. A shocking piece of information was recently revealed that just showed the tight budget of the movie and how much of a salary Mel Gibson earned for the role!
Mel Gibson’s Modified Car Was Worth More Than His Salary!
With George Miller as the director andMad Maxbeing one of the first few films of Mel Gibson, the salary of the lead actor was quite a bit low. Although what Gibson received was quite low, we can draw some comparisons.
Throughout the film, Gibson drove an iconic V8 Interceptor which became a symbol for the film. The car was modified by production designer Murray Smith when Miller stated that he wanted an “evil-looking, Australian car.” As per a post on X (formerly Twitter), it was revealed that the car cost $35,000 to make which was roughly three times more than the paycheck thatMel Gibsonreceived for starring in the film!

“It really stuck with me”: George Miller’s Mad Max Became a Reality Because of a Tragic Real-Life Incident That Spawned a $529M Franchise
Max’s famous V8 Interceptor car was modified by production designer Murray Smith, following Miller’s brief for an “evil-looking, Australian car.” It cost over $35,000 to create – more than three times Mel Gibson’s salary for the film.
27/44pic.twitter.com/11yM3g5Jcx

— All The Right Movies (@ATRightMovies)July 27, 2025
“She literally looks like Charlize Theron”: Anya Taylor-Joy’s Furiosa Look Confuses Fans After Actress Claimed Mad Max Director Didn’t Allow Shaving Her Head
Another post revealed that Gibson was paid $10,000 for his role as Max in the 1979 film. On top of that, he had to do all the hand-to-hand fight scenes himself. Although this resulted in a spectacular film, Gibson was later cut from the U.S. trailers of the film!
Why George Miller DepictedMad MaxIn A Dystopian World!
Having financial troubles made for the perfect reason for George Miller to set his film in a post-apocalyptic world but it wasn’t always the plan. In an interview withDeadline, here’s what Miller had to say about his 1979 film.
“He lived long enough to become the villain”: ‘Furiosa: A Mad Max’ Trailer May be About Anya Taylor-Joy But It’s Chris Hemsworth Who Stole the Show
“[It was] almost impossible to do action sequences in the streets of Melbourne in the city in the modern day… the idea was to set it in a dystopian future simply because we could play in empty streets —”
He further continued,

“And that was a really lucky thing because accidentally the film, which otherwise would have been present-day naturalistic, turned out to be more allegoric, unwittingly, and that’s what led to Mad Max and that’s why I’m still doing them because they’re very addictive.”
Released in 1979 and earning $100 million worldwide,Mad Maxreceived a rating of 6.8/10 on IMDB and a whopping 89% on Rotten Tomatoes.The film is currently available to stream on Prime Video in the U.S.

Visarg Acharya
Senior Writer
Articles Published :3263
Visarg Acharya is a Senior Writer at FandomWire, majorly focusing on movies, with over 3000 articles published. He has been an entertainment journalist for the past three years and a copywriter at a corporation. Visarg usually covers news and theories on the MCU and the DCU, with an emphasis on Avengers and Superman; Game of Thrones, and more.A Tarantino fan, Visarg, spends his time critiquing various directors’ filmographies and watching them with curiosity. Medieval fantasy like The Lord of the Rings or sci-fi movies like Interstellar, watching the latest horror movies, and listening to Hans Zimmer become his comfort zone. When idle, he can be found reading fantasy novels with a terrible cup of coffee in hand.